View Single Post
Old 29-10-2016, 06:50   #10
mrmistoffelees
067
 
mrmistoffelees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 49
Services: Many
Posts: 4,998
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
Re: Increase in benefit cuts linked to rise in numbers using food banks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu View Post
mrmistoffelees. I do read the article. The article was stated by the Trust that runs the biggest chain of Foodbnks in the Country.

Since the Tories took over, these Food Banks have quardrupled in this time. This is down to the severe cuts, and benefit cuts that have lead to this.

Its very typical of the Government to say it isn't connected due to cuts.

If l wasn't working, l would have to use one. My benefit would be £72.00 per week - and yes, l have checked

The Social take into account of what my son gets. If he went for another benefit - he has been told by the Social that he will lose his benefit totally.

Food banks - you need a voucher from the Social Service's to get the Food Bank stuff.

My son lost 50% of his benefit. He cannot work, as he has to be 'shadowed' either by my wife who is 24 our carer or him at £60.00 per week. Or myself.
Was your son sanctioned ?

The report's lead author, Dr Rachel Loopstra, said: "(Our) findings show clear evidence of sanctions being linked to economic hardship and hunger, as we see a close relationship between sanctioning rates and rates of food bank usage across local authorities in the UK."

again I suggest you didn't read the article
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......
mrmistoffelees is offline   Reply With Quote