Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Those polls are invalid for they only really measure between 100-1000 sample sizes and the New York Times is biased in HC favor, so it is obvious they will target known Democratic safe areas.
I read somewhere that an Internal poll, with a sample size of 50,000 US citizens, 1000 citizens from each of the 50 states, the results were, Trump 67%, Clinton on just 19%. This is fitting in with the trends at Trump rallies, they are full to bursting with people still queuing outside, Hillary struggles to fill venues at her rallies. Trump also has millions of more supporters and followers on social media than Hillary does, my American friends tell me they see a LOT more Trump / Pence signs than they do Hillary signs, around their towns and cities and neighbourhoods. All these things cannot be ignored that it is a strong indication and that it is highly likely that Donald J Trump, will become the 45th President of the United States.
|
Here are the national polls from the last week:
Including a +7 from Fox News. These are published polls that report their numbers and their method as opposed to a rumor about an internal poll that suspiciously deviate from all the others. Besides if people are going to make up poll numbers they should make it realistic. 19% is obviously not going to happen. It would mean a big majority of registered democrats switching to Trump, hardly any states being Democratic, and
would be almost twice as big as the biggest landslide victory in American history.
Yard signs are not indicative of national success. How do we know your American friends don't live in a deep red state? I could say I know loads of people with Clinton signs in California. It doesn't mean anything.