Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
In the original case she was being judged on her sex life. That is how MacDonald was found non guilty. She was considered to be the sort of person that would go off with a random bloke for sex whilst being too drunk to give consent.
|
I find that part very disturbing. I don't understand why her prior sex life is relevant but as I wasn't in the Court of Appeals or in the Jury I've refrained from commenting on it.
It's also why I don't understand the language and venom directed at this women. There seems to be a double-standard, a nasty one, about woman have many partners and a man having them. IMO both are fine, if everyone consents what's the problem.