[Arthurgray50@blu]

This case proves to me several things.

All the hypocrites who slagged him off. Clubs that were against him, sponsors who withdrew there sponsor ship dosh should be ashamed of themselves.

The case relied mainly on the evidence of the case. I have been on a rape case on a jury.

Rape is a very serious offence. It relies on the evidence put to the court, times, and what is stated by the victim.

The Victim was a willing partner in the first instance with the first player. Then the second player joins in and the victim accepted this.

Its only rape 'at point of entry' and the victim accepted the activity. IF, the victim had said NO, then that is rape.

And also the words that 'were used' l like it 'rough'

The idea that a 'bribe' was used l think is wrong.

I think that most of this case has been hidden from the press. I read some of the of the case on my phone via Sky News.

Rape, should be in the same legal line as Murder. Its a very serious crime. But at the end of the day, it all comes down to the evidence at the time.

I feel for the victim.

---------- Post added at 23:26 ---------- Previous post was at 23:24 ----------

And also, the vitim said that she hadn't taken any drugs, which would hve made her 'docile'. But she said that she hadn't taken drugs, But in urine tests that she had taken. There were traces of drugs in her urine/