Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Also a not guilty verdict is not evidence the accusor was lying.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Worth reading this:
|
On the other hand she went along with the CPS accusation that she had never said or done anything similar before. She had, and the retrial found that way. If he didn't have enough money behind him to investigate things, he wouldn't have been able to bring the case this far. Anybody else would have remained unfairly convicted.
Don't know why the fact that he is a footballer is relevant to the case. What is relevant is that the woman had sex with at least 4 random men whilst too drunk. Only one of the 4 ended up being convicted. Women do go out with the express intention, formed whilst sober, of going out and getting drunk and having sex with a complete stranger. This woman did so on at least 3 separate occasions.