Thread: General Large bundles of Channels
View Single Post
Old 14-10-2016, 11:25   #55
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Large bundles of Channels

I don't disagree about the OTT providers being decent value for money do you think I'd have started this thread if I thought traditional pay tv was value for money for me.

My point is in a create your own bundle world I'd be choosing the Sky Entertainment channels over the majority of its competing pay tv Entertainment channels.

I read your posts and I'm astonished you even continue with Pay TV when your so happy with the online providers , my only current reason for keeping pay tv is sport however I know you've said you don't watch that.

Last edited by muppetman11; 14-10-2016 at 11:40.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote