Thread: General Large bundles of Channels
View Single Post
Old 12-10-2016, 20:34   #41
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Large bundles of Channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant View Post
Because it's popular.

As nicely illustrated by Chad, people say they want less but they aren't willing to pay for it.
But you can already get less , Now TV offers a small channel range at a fraction of the cost of the regular Sky and Virgin Media packages as do over the top services like Amazon and Netflix via On Demand content.

There's a reason Sky are clinging onto Sport for dear life , the ironic part being that it's sport that's causing it the most issues.

I'm not for one minute suggesting there will be a mass exodus from traditional pay tv although things will have to change , in my opinion we'll see more and more less watched channels feeling the squeeze as the likes of Sky look to reduce costs with bundles of pay channels becoming smaller.

Last edited by muppetman11; 12-10-2016 at 20:38.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote