View Single Post
Old 07-10-2016, 14:58   #14
Osem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Re: Cliff Richard to sue the BBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Police, Camera, Action isn't broadcast live, and the owners of the houses that get busted have their faces pixelated unless they have been convicted of a crime by the time the show airs, or have given their permission for their faces to be shown.

The police did this because in the heat of the celebrity paedophile scandal they wanted to be seen to be Doing Something, and because, I suspect, they were fishing for witnesses. Historic accusations like this are extremely difficult to prove. To succeed, a case needs multiple victims who don't know each other and have had no contact with each other to come forward independently and give statements against the suspect that show consistent patterns of offending.

Clearly, based on recent developments, the police did not have that kind of evidence, and that makes the whole house raid look like a massive fishing expedition. To televise it and name the suspect based on such flimsy evidence was outrageous and the BBC and South Yorks Police really ought to be getting their apologies and generous out-of-court settlements lined up right now.
I'd like to see a few heads roll but they'd probably just get early retirement and/or generous pay-offs...
Osem is offline   Reply With Quote