Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
I'm confused. If we implement Cameron's agreement then we can repatriate these EU criminals. If we don't, we can't. And as I explained earlier, we need to keep the EU member states on board if we're to get a good settlement with them and trade deals afterwards. It's called diplomacy or common sense.
If you can grab a couple of minutes to read that fact-checking website you should find it useful. It concludes "These changes don’t deliver on the Prime Minister’s previous proposals for “tougher and longer” re-entry bans for foreign rough sleepers, beggars and fraudsters. But they do qualify as “stronger powers to deport criminals and stop them coming back”.
I'm afraid that fact-checking websites are rather dry and less of an interesting read than UKIP tabloids like the Daily Express. But their findings are accurate and that's what's important...whatever your opinion of EU membership.[COLOR="Silver"]
|
FFS..... your right you are confused
Camerons agreement doesn't mean a thing ,we have voted to leave so all of his supposed deals are useless and meaningless,the choice we had was to vote to leave or remain with a renegotiated deal with the EU we chose the former because the latter didn't happen and apart from that even if we had voted to stay he ONLY NEGOTIATED IT THIS YEAR so that means for years previously we have had trouble deporting criminals and powerless to prevent them entering the UK.The biggest criticism Cameron got after his return from the negotiating table was that his deal was ineffective and meaningless ,that is one reason why we voted to leave