View Single Post
Old 20-09-2016, 22:10   #130
adzii_nufc
Rafalution
 
adzii_nufc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 35
Posts: 5,338
adzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appeal
adzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appealadzii_nufc has a bronzed appeal
Re: US Election 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
I think Trump is a lot worse than Clinton. I think it's a dangerous man. He said Obama wasn't born in the states, as I previously said he has suggested America go after the families of suspected terrorists, he said Mexican immigrants were raping people, he has frequently gone after women with comments about their appearance be it the wives of rival candidates, rival candidates themselves or people interviewing him and wanted to punish woman who have abortions which not even pro-life campaigners want.

That's without his long list of business deals behind him.

Clinton isn't perfect, she would be lose massively to pretty much any other of the Republicans who stood in the Primary, but Trump is a internet comment section turned real. He would rather be bulling some group of people that talk about policy. His answers to foreign policy is usually 'we'll go in there and sort it out'.

What is he actually going to do when he is President? No one seems to know. We have an idea with Clinton, it's slightly left of Obama but still rather centrist.

What is he going to do abroad? What if his commanders refuse to kill the family of a terrorist? Why is that even a discussion point?
Then nothing. There's no requirement. As per the constitution:
Quote:
You are not required to follow an unlawful order. That would be in violation of all the international laws of armed conflict.
Just the same rules that stop the POTUS shooting your face off in public.

But commanders wouldn't refuse that order, they have no issue dropping missiles on civilians elsewhere so why would this make a difference? See the problem there... Obama has had no issue with the civilian death toll caused by chasing terrorists abroad. Killing their families and even some completely unrelated to terrorism at all. It becomes an issue when a madman talks about it though. A country that knows full well that they're racking up collateral damage each time they target a terrorist suddenly have an issue when someone openly says they'll do what Obama is doing. Must be the way he never used the terms 'Incorrect Intelligence or accident'
__________________
All posts are the opinion of myself and don't reflect those of BT or Openreach.

Last edited by adzii_nufc; 20-09-2016 at 22:19.
adzii_nufc is offline