Quote:
Originally Posted by adzii_nufc
The reasons for not wanting a war in Korea are known, they're valid reasons, the point I tried to make was those reasons also exist in the middle east, are we not being flooded with Migrants?
|
That is a unintended consequence, not a desired goal. The long-term international plan is to unify Korea. The goal for middle-eastern intervention was for the countries to govern themselves under new leadership who were able to control the nation, ideally with western interests in mind.
Quote:
|
Are people not running from a battle we stuck our nose in. Filled up headlines with great reasons for arming rebels and enabling them to fight back, pictures of wounded and what life is like, the usual messages.
|
Once a civil war starts it's not unnatural to try and choose a winner. It's not as if Syria would be calm had there been no intervention from the West. Maybe the ideal scenario would have been Assad crushing both ISIS and the more moderate rebels but such an aspiration is hardly a better motivation and would probably be condemned by the same people who admonish the West now.
Quote:
|
Just didn't quite work out well when said Rebels either joined ISIS or started killing kids on camera. Yep, the men Mr Obama and co armed, the men they supported in the media (Propaganda) were the same men that did the above.
|
I doubt ISIS would have struggled to find weapons. The world is armed to the teeth:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...shnikov-ak-47s