Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
I think the Junior Doctors suffered a set-back after the deal was accepted and then rejected. It's harder to see their justification now.
On the 7-day NHS though I do think the Goverment are trying to get it on the cheap. 2 extra days requires more funding surely? Substantially more funding. Maybe not 40% as I doubt their budgets scale like that but certainly a hefty increase. Then we also need more doctors. How is a 5 day week going to stretch to a 7 day week? You can adjust the timetables so the hospitals are staffed more on weekends but are we suggesting that the doctors sit around doing nothing during the week? If not then the coverage on weekdays will suffer. Spreading the same amount of butter on a large slice of toast will give you thinner..err..butterage.
Personally I would sooner seen the government abandon, for now, the plans for a 7 day NHS until such a time they have a clearer idea of how to fund it and how to staff it. If that requires reform into how we pay for the NHS (separate tax?) then so be it.
I also think any politician who says we can have better services at the same cost is a liar. We already don't push the boat out on spending compared to European countries. For whatever reforms we can introduce to help the solution to this problem is more money.
|
I always saw a 7 day NHS more of a load spreading exercise ,for example,if a hospital treats 100,000 in/out patients over 5 days surely it's better to treat the same 100,000 patients over 7 days ,less work load on the doctors and nurses.There will naturally have to be more doctors and nurses but the NHS is having a big recruitment drive anyway due to staff shortages .The main reason for a 7 day NHS is for out patients really imo