View Single Post
Old 03-09-2016, 18:59   #28
mrmistoffelees
067
 
mrmistoffelees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 50
Services: Many
Posts: 5,096
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
Re: Obese people and smokers to be refused surgery (now in review)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
I believe that smokers should pay for the increased cost of their healthcare- and they do.

The vast majority of the costs of a packet of cigarettes is made up of tax.

Of this tax, 20% is equivalent to the extra costs of treating smoking related illnesses.

The other 80% is pure profit for the Government to spend as it chooses.

If this is the way we are going though, why not charge those injured whilst playing sport, running or getting drunk etc?
Precisely the same question I raised, yet it strangely remains unanswered.
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......
mrmistoffelees is offline   Reply With Quote