View Single Post
Old 29-08-2016, 10:10   #23
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Bad Broadband Quality Monitor results after Homeworker+ 300Mbit upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
With regard to the bit I've highlighted in red, what are you saying? It seems that you have made the latency additive (as in 16 * .32ms = 5.12ms).

How can that be? Bonding is a parallel function using Frequency Division Multiplexing. It is not additive.
Good to see you listen to me. It's usually wasted effort but not unknown for me to say something useful
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote