Thread: General Olympics - Brazil 2016
View Single Post
Old 21-08-2016, 22:14   #111
TheDaddy
cf.mega pornstar
 
TheDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,187
TheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden aura
TheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden auraTheDaddy has a golden aura
Re: Olympics - Brazil 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
On the contrary, the Knights of sport and stage are the ones whose endeavours most effectively bring the world's attention to the UK. The honours system has consistently recognised this over many years.

On the contrary we all recognise exactly what the honours system is about and it isn't to reward sportsmen or actors, it's to reward cronies for keeping their mouths shut or doing dirty deeds, the odd sop to an athlete is merely to distract the public from that imo.

---------- Post added at 22:09 ---------- Previous post was at 22:06 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
No because the Lottery was introduced exactly for the development of sports and other non tax funded activities .If your suggesting that lottery funds should be diverted to the NHS or used to prop up pensions then i for one could not disagree more strongly

Its interesting that the lottery can provide support to the tune of 3/4 billion for elite athletes whilst at the same time 300 swimming pools have shut in the same time frame.

---------- Post added at 22:14 ---------- Previous post was at 22:09 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by tweetiepooh View Post
Saw article today Bolt close to being fastest possible.

Statistician claiming that Bolt is close to the maximum speed a human can attain. And similar is true at 400m. This would mean without some "enhancements" or some unexpected improvement there won't be many more records broken at 100m and 400m, maybe once more and that's it. Bit like if some archer got 720 in the ranking shoot. That's the maximum, no-one can beat it.
Or a regression rather than improvement

http://metro.co.uk/2009/10/19/ancien...egger-3421373/
__________________
Sports Babble
TheDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote