Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
The building is owned by an islamic company. There are free to impose any rules they wish, or are you objecting to owners of a property being allowed to impose rules on that property?
Put it another way. I don't know your views on weed, but assuming you did not like it, would you allow a tenant in a house you owned to grow his or her own plants? If not, do you think they should be allowed to anyway, and you have no say? I ask because that appears to be exactly what you are saying. You appear to be saying that the MPs should be allowed to drink alcohol regardless of the wishes of the building's owners.
|
To be fair, weed is illegal but alcohol isn't. Strange method of argument on your part
