View Single Post
Old 18-07-2016, 12:04   #210
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: How big are VM's infills?

Blimey, 3 months ago the digging was done in some streets, still no homes live due to a couple of issues.

Problem with getting power to a cabinet and problem getting a fibre cross-connect between a couple of telco MSANs.

Neither an issue with FTTP. Perhaps a pity it was planned so long ago!

---------- Post added at 11:04 ---------- Previous post was at 11:00 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Also fibre intensive, you need a fibre pair from the customer location back to the head end.

Still ,It was being looked at so they could claim the country's fastest broadband tag.

RFoG is a bit pants IMO. But it enables fTTP roll out without wholesale change to the VM network delivery and as I see it, at least the fibre infrastructure is at least in place and other solutions can be delivered over it in the future should things change.
Just as a thought, didn't really read this earlier, could fire quite a few Gb down a single fibre via PON.

The latest and greatest would allow symmetrical 10Gb to each subscriber and co-exist with RFoG, GPON, XGPON. The ONT and OLT are probably scary expensive for right now, though.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote