View Single Post
Old 03-07-2016, 13:52   #26
Paul
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 30,569
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Re: Revealed: Where speed cameras target drivers in London as they drive to work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taf View Post
Inner city speed limits are being dropped here to "reduce pollution" in areas that are monitored. Not in unmonitored areas though. The "safety" excuse is a con.

But I adhere to the speed limit whatever it is.
Ther are 20 mph limits all over Nottingham city.
Complete waste of time as [almost] no one sticks to them.

As to pollution, and safety, a car doing 20mph will be in an area 50% longer than one doing 30mph, so even if the engine is putting out the same fumes in both cases, there will be 50% more pollution in that area (and I always understood that at lower sppeds, engines put out more pollution).

To actually stick to 20mph, you have to spend a lot more time actually watching your speed, so less time watching the road, I dont see how thats safer for anyone.
__________________

Baby, I was born this way.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote