Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Brian
I agree but people are going to vote on stupid things like roaming charges. Do the youngsters go abroad that often that it would make a big difference to them?
---------- Post added at 11:10 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------
EU immigration to the UK has not harmed British peoples’ access to jobs, public services or incomes, a major study has concluded.
Oh really? Is that why the NHS is full of them instead of training and employing our own Citizens?
|
Have a relevant story for the bottom part. Already posted this one in another thread. Before my role as a security advisor I worked through ranks as Static security, Door work, VIP security and finally Security Advisor. This relates to my time as a static officer.
Mr A (Nigerian) and Mr B (Unknown nationality) were both working alongside me on numerous occasions. Both pleasant chaps and spoke clear English. However they were on numerous occasions coaxed into 48-72 hour shifts over a weekend which is illegal and it turns out Mr A no longer had a work visa which they actually knew about but never acted upon. Part two relates to December, Christmas being a very hectic month. The company wanted to bring more staff on and specifically hired non UK born workers because as my manager put they wouldn't complain when released after the new year, some were middle eastern, there was a pleasant Polish chap and a very quiet and strange Danish male, I laughed once after he said Copenhagen but pronounced It as Coopenhargen which was presumably how the Danish say it. Part 1 indicates they should've been hiring extra workers to cover hours without breaking the law. Part 2 indicates they'd favour immigrants because when the work dies down they're easier to fob off.
Also the majority of G4s employees still remaining at the 2012 Olympics were of middle eastern origin at least in Newcastle.