Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Not really.
We (they) just need to ban the means of killing people on an industrial scale. The more difficult it is to make a point by killing someone, the fewer people will try.
|
That's pretty much it. People can say you'll have to ban this that and the other.. Or you could just think logical and ban the weapons capable of mass murdering civillians that are legably purchasable.
People make homemade bombs in numerous countries, if some nutter really wanted to he'd do it here too, that can't be helped in all cases.
The main issue is still the ability to purchase an assault rifle and there's absolutely nothing stopping you appearing at a crowded event and popping shots off.
But I'm sure the NRA will call for folks to carry their army grade weapon at all times to protect themselves. Absolutely absurd that any civilian on this planet would actually need an assault rifle.
It would be as simple as limiting sales to handguns only with restricted calibers. I say would because the damage has already been done. They'll never be able to disarm the US now. Its far too late. But you know, a right to bear arms would never lead to absolute psychopaths going on a rampage.
This is the third biggest mass shooting globally that isn't a warzone.
So hell bent of fighting a war on terror everywhere else but failing to protect their own from the madmen in their own back yard.