Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
Isn't it more the case of "what model fits [the evidence] best"? You can believe any model you can imagine but until you have objective, demonstrable evidence as proof, you would not have be able to present the model as a viable scientific theory.
|
I'm not a scientist, and don't know what is the norm in these things. The scientist in my quote seems to think 'established facts of science' is a parameter. Maybe because evidence is likely to change with new discoveries, whereas, established facts don't change? I don't really know.
Talking evidence, which obviously you have to decide the validity of yourself, there are
353 Old Testament prophecies that
had to be fulfilled in the person of Jesus.
Statistically impossible if Jesus wasn't the true prophesised Messiah, especially the genealogy ones.
Quote:
"...all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me" (Jesus Christ, Luke 24:44)
|
http://www.accordingtothescriptures....rophecies.html