Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
I would think that scientists that believe in Creation especially in the Biblical definition would be a contradiction. To be a scientist, you would demand proof of theory and you would assess any evidence against the proposed theory in order to reach a conclusion as to the veracity of the theory.
I can see that some scientists could ignore evidence of the age of the solar system, evolution, etc but I doubt that any have proof of the alternative, biblical, alternative.
|
It seems that from a science perspective, without absolute proof on a specific matter, it's a case of 'what model fits best'. Some believe Creation fits best and some believe Evolution fits best. That's why Creation and Evolution are both a belief/faith issue; each person chooses which set of scientists to believe.
Quote:
A former Evolutionist, Dr. Wilder-Smith debated various leading scientists on the subject throughout the world. In his opinion, the Evolution model did not fit as well with the established facts of science as did the Creation model of intelligent design."The Evolutionary model says that it is not necessary to assume the existence of anything, besides matter and energy, to produce life. That proposition is unscientific. We know perfectly well that if you leave matter to itself, it does not organize itself - in spite of all the efforts in recent years to prove that it does." 5
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-ed...cientists.html
|
The integrated message of the whole Bible, given it's authorship timespan of 2000 years by multiple authors, shows 'intelligent design' to me.