A good reposte to Dawkins in
God's Undertaker - John Lennox.
I've found this to be a well written and ordered volume. It is far less "foam at mouth" than some for both sides. The essential premise is that even if Dawkins' science is right it doesn't prove the non-existence of God. It also argues that the science isn't proven either.
(There are detractors to this book claiming that Dr X work on something shows that the book is wrong in this fact. But that will always happen as the book is published at a point in time and science continues, this is true on both sides.)
----
Atheism isn't absence of faith, it's more absences of an object (person) of faith. And it's often those atheists who want to impose their belief on others citing freedom to prevent others expressing their faith. It's a small step between avoiding harassment and denying rights.