View Single Post
Old 25-05-2016, 22:29   #2759
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,411
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Netflix/Streaming Services

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Max View Post
Lol, you can argue anything depending on which side you are on,
Without veering off topic too much, you misunderstand. IFS is independent and neutral. This was acknowledged today by Economists for Brexit so this is not one side's propaganda.

---------- Post added at 21:29 ---------- Previous post was at 21:24 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by toady View Post
This is bad news for consumers, I already subscribe to three streaming services, I couldn't afford a forth unless I left one of the others, so less content for me to watch
The fragmentation of cable packages is potentially bad news for some consumers. Traditional cable packages are relatively cheap per channel as they work on the basis that some people watch some channels and some people watch other channels but no one watches all the channels all the time. Some people understandably misunderstand how the system works and think they're paying for channels they don't watch. For example, BT in the XL pack cost VM about £3.50 per subscriber but it costs a lot more than this to subscribe to the channel itself.
1andrew1 is offline