Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
What you did was sit in Kwikfit for an hour and make stupid and totally ridiculous assumptions based purely on your own prejudices and the fact that you didn't see any *money change hands* and then run home to find an article to back up your assumptions from that poor excuse for a news source and now you keep saying other posters are "off topic" when they disagree with your view point.
|
Quite the persistent little storyteller aren't you?
What really happened was I read the Mail, which I have delivered every day to keep abreast of all the dodgers and swindlers, and was incensed by the Motability swindlers article. Apoplectic with rage, I knew only a discussion on CF could sort the whole mess out. I hadn't expected Aesop to be spinning his fables here.
Unfortunately, Motability swindlers are still swindling to this day. Luckily, you and I are keeping it in the public eye; you're being a lot sneakier about it than I am though you ol' Devil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
The onus is on you to provide links to your quotes so other members can read the full text not just the bits chosen to back up a particular view point and taken out of context.
|
Ok, ok, don't be embarrassed to ask for help with techy marty. Here's a link:
Finding stuff on the Internet for Dummies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
Perhaps the OP did not provide a link to any article regarding the "Motability tyre fraud" as it did not cost the motability scheme a penny. It was Kwik Fit who were defrauded by thier workers.
|
Who said it did? Read the thread to understand the context there's a good chap, you've got it wrong again
. Motability was used as a vehicle (no pun intended) for the fraud. Does your neighbour know you abuse his internet connection by posting your half-baked contributions?
Quote:
Originally Posted by techguyone
I know it's wrong but I LOL'd a little bit.
|
