Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
Then why defend the indefensible?
|
Who's defending the indefensible? I have simply acknowledged that the press as a whole is not 100% accurate at all times. It might well be the DM report on this topic is accurate and that's why I thought an airing here might be useful.
Interestingly, the response has been very defensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
Repeating this childish retort doesn't help your argument to counter the view, seemingly held by most here, that the Daily Mail is a pernicious and morally bankrupt publication.
|
I have asked the same question of individual posters none of whom have replied. That's not repeating a childish retort it is a valid, grown up question.
Either people don't read the Mail so are commenting blind or they do read the Mail but don't want to admit it because you might call them morally bankrupt.
Of course your main aim is to divert from the swindled £70m. So returning to topic, what is you view on that?