Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
They probably all have a friend who reads it and tells them about it (in quite a bit of detail it would seem). 
I wonder if one day we will all be able to discuss things here without aggressive overtones and ad hominem attacks? Where information is provided to correct mistaken opinion rather than full on insult? When difference of opinion can just be accepted?
I suppose it just wouldn't be CF without a dose of irrationality.  |
The thing with the mail is that with the smallest amount of research the claims it makes can be totally debunked .The journalists either grossly misrepresent the facts or simply lie to get a story .Probably the same with most of the papers these days but the Mail is renowned for it
---------- Post added at 19:16 ---------- Previous post was at 19:13 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by techguyone
This isn't a thread or a discussion its the OP posting something that's not even accurate and then arguing vivaciously with anyone who dares to disagree, regardless of the facts or not.
/Muted
|
What do you expect he read it in the Mail
---------- Post added at 19:28 ---------- Previous post was at 19:16 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
Fair enough in the long term. What about the swindling in the shorter term though? Is it only me that thinks £70m is a lot of money?
|
Of course it's a lot of money and fraud does get tackled when it's known about but there is only so much anyone can do because it's human nature to want stuff for free