[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Stop It

Oh god. If there is a dress code it shouldn't exclude perfectly reasonable attire. High Heels should be allowed, not forced. It's not exactly rocket science this. Receptionists are employees, not eye candy. Again, what year is this?

It is perfectly reasonable for an employer to have a dress code, it is not reasonable for a dress code to conform to sexist stereotypes in an office! PwC are an auditing firm, not Hooters for crying out loud.

Guess what, that doesn't exist. If an actor required to wear heels on set, they will, after that, I'm sure they'll be free to swap.

She didn't agree, hence the dispute. Your posts make me think that you're stuck at 11:55am on a Saturday morning when Fighting Talk airs. permanently stuck Defending The Indefensible.

Guess what, she agreed to the general dress code in the contract for the agency. It wasn't PwC that specified anything. The danger is that if you don't have specific dress codes, then anything goes.

The company initially said Ms Thorp, from Hackney, had signed its "appearance guidelines" but said it would review them.