View Single Post
Old 13-04-2016, 11:16   #14
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,515
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: Council becomes first in the UK to charge runners who use public park

Council minutes from two months ago - apparently, this conversation has been underway since October 2015, which hasn't been mentioned in the news...

http://www.stokegifford.org.uk/attac...ary%202016.pdf
Quote:
Parkrun – A short statement was read out by a parkrun representative in attendance which included comments on the timescales for a decision by the Parish Council on the future of the parkrun event at Little Stoke Park that takes place on Saturday and Sunday mornings in the park. The statement also emphasised the organisations ethos is that everything is free and their inability to contribute or be responsible for the maintenance of any of the grounds where the run takes place.

The Clerk clarified that the motion had been passed in October 2015 stating that a decision regarding the future of Parkrun would not be made until April 2016, and therefore this matter could not be brought forward unless he was requested to do so as the Proper Officer by six Councillors in writing.

Unfortunately, the Clerk had been absent from the Council meeting in January when this matter had been discussed, and it was indicated that a decision might be made sooner for the benefit of all parties involved.

It was also reiterated by the Clerk that despite recent negative publicity within the local media and press, the Council were only now requesting that a grant application be completed by the parkrun to both South Gloucestershire Council and the local Public Health body in order to obtain grant funding towards future park maintenance in the future. The Clerk also emphasised that Parkrun had declined these potential offers of funding.

The statement was met with a great deal of resentment from a number of local residents who were also in attendance at the meeting, and the general feeling amongst the room was that the organisation should contribute towards the upkeep of sites used. A number of residents commented on the manner in which representatives of the organisation had gone about stating unpleasant and negative comments about the Council within the local press and social media perceiving that runners would be charged and unrelated to matters actually discussed during recent meetings. One resident stated that she could see that the Council were doing everything they could to signpost parkrun to the available community grants for the benefit of the park.

A resident thanked the Council for the way in which the park had been managed over a number of years and emphasised the importance of the park being accessible to everyone and not just runners. The resident added that he respected the park and appreciated the wonderful facility available for general use by all visitors /park users.
Here are the minutes of the October 2015 meeting.

http://www.stokegifford.org.uk/attac...ber%202015.pdf
Quote:
TO DISCUSS THE FUTURE OF PARKRUN AT LITTLE STOKE PARK

At a recent meeting of the Finance & General Purposes Committee, the Council unanimously agreed to implement an annual maintenance charge relating to the Adult Saturday Parkrun at Little Stoke Park effective from Saturday 7th November 2015, and it was proposed that a £1 charge per adult per week should be collected by Parkrun.

A meeting between representatives of both the Council and Parkrun took place shortly afterwards to discuss the proposed maintenance charge and the day to day operational issues being experienced on site.

The following points/issues were discussed during the meeting:-
 Parish Council responsible for all paths other than the cycle/pedestrian path at the back of the park.
 Significant parking issues with alternative sites not being used
 Runners have access to toilet provision and storage
 General disruption to other users of the site
 General maintenance of the park
 Background and Ethos of Parkrun
 Benefits of Parkrun to the local community
 Possibility of submitting a grant request to the Area Wide Forum
 Public Liability
 Parish Council to discuss Parkrun at October and November meetings

EB advised that a letter had been received Chrissie Wellington, Head of Participation for Parkrun HQ, which outlined a number of key points about the successes and statistics associated with the Little Stoke Parkrun.

The meeting was attended by the Little Stoke Parkrun core team and Brian Gardner, the Active Lifestyles Team Leader at South Gloucestershire Council, who originally involved in setting up the Little Stoke Parkrun.

At the meeting it was noted that Parkrun is always free to participants, generates no revenue at local level and does not pay for the use of parks and open spaces. However that parkrun’s added value, through the range of positive personal and community impacts, presents a considerable benefit to ocal people, communities and the council, and even provides cost savings across a range of areas.

Parkrun are committed to improving the operational issues on weekends that have been highlighted which include the provision of parking in the locality during runs.

Council agreed to defer this item for 6 months in order to find solutions to moving forward discussions in relation to this matter.
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote