[downquark1]

Originally Posted by Damien

Does anyone actually understand what Cameron is alleged to have done or not? Everyone is angry, it's all over the papers and I don't understand it and suspect most people reading it don't understand either. We need to know more than 'tax haven' because if, as the interview said, he said tax on it then what taxes did he dodge?

God I wish some papers would just print a unbiased fact-check of why/how etc of these kinds of stories.

It's impossible to form a fair judgement of this if you don't understand what 'it' is.

Assuming everything Cameron says is true, the remaining implication Tom Watson seems to be running with, is that he profited from an overseers company helping people avoid tax.