Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Brian
Are you having a laugh. Notice the date on that article? 26 Mar 2016. Today is the 24th. Anyhow isn't the Economist just a little biased?
|
It's wrong because of the date stamp? I don't see why that matters. They seem to use the weekend date for their publication, no idea why.
The Economist is pro-EU yes but no-one else on here is publishing neutral sources. The Economist is hardly a sensationalist magazine is it.
Quote:
|
Don't you think that the EU, especially Germany and France would be falling over themselves to negotiate a good trade deal with the UK? Someone touched on this a few pages back saying they could see a France, German and UK Bloc and I totally agree with that.
|
Why would they? As the article states all 27 European nations have to agree, they may all want to put in provisions, and not all of them have trade deficits with the UK. We are dependent on services more than a lot of them are so well and what happens if we end up with a Canada deal that doesn't include them? That would be harmful to the economy.
Quote:
|
More scaremongering in that rag I'm afraid.
|
You can't dismiss every concern as scaremongering and every source as a 'rag'.