View Single Post
Old 23-03-2016, 09:12   #203
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: How big are VM's infills?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 View Post
Why a fibre pair? Is VM buying cheap low quality fibre that can't deliver the same as anyone else's???
Que?

One fibre to transmit the other to receive?



---------- Post added at 08:12 ---------- Previous post was at 08:08 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by vm_tech View Post
I don't doubt that, I was looking at it purely from a technical perspective. RFoG essentially has the same bottle neck as HFC, the CMTS port. As things progress that will become less of an issue, but FTTP should be some to shout about, with vastly improved upload
They can relatively easily remove the bottleneck and put other things over the fibre without affecting RFoG which is nice.

Can happily use the same fibre to deliver DOCSIS to regular users while Team Torrent can, for a price, be offloaded onto a PON solution.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote