View Single Post
Old 22-03-2016, 21:53   #199
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: How big are VM's infills?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vm_tech View Post
My opinion is that is the way to go!
Too expensive. Comcast have done this but only delivering FTTP when ordered, not to replace existing service. Delivered as Metro Ethernet, so point to point fibre between home and customer.

Expensive, long contract, high install charge.

CenturyLink used the existing coax to pull through a new coax + fibre drop and sold 1Gb over GPON. Lower pricing and more of an FTTP on demand scenario. Eases load on the existing HFC plant by overbuilding it when heavy users stump up the money.

---------- Post added at 20:53 ---------- Previous post was at 20:51 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrIca View Post
Wouldn't it need different set top boxes and routers though?
If you're referring to RFoG, no. An ONT in the home converts the fibre to coax for distribution to existing STBs and hubs.

In the case of the Metro Ethernet solution existing coaxial drop carries the TV, a new Metro Ethernet switch terminates the new fibre connection and connects to a customer's own router much as modem mode on a Superhub works.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote