View Single Post
Old 15-03-2016, 13:03   #689
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,271
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: The future for linear TV channels

Interesting report on Andrew Neill's speech for SES. He says he has changed his opinion and the so-called insurgents are not as disruptive as he previously believed. “Netflix is not the great disrupter and TV will not die in 2030 as is the claim of Netflix CEO Reed Hastings.” "Neil said there was pain at the margins for broadcasters, but Netflix was starting to struggle in the United States. “It’s not a disrupter, it’s a network.”
http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2016/...tv-golden-age/
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote