View Single Post
Old 14-03-2016, 14:12   #189
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: More cuts from failing Osborne

Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy View Post
Linky

Funny sort of giving to the rich seeing as their contribution to income tax has relentlessly risen over the last two decades.
I'm sure you know it's a tad more complicated than that.

Include things like indirect taxation into the equation, something that governments have been abusing more and more as the years have gone on, and compensate for any increases in income and wealth equality, then see how we are.

It's actually an abysmal failure of the system if the top 1% are contributing so much of the taxation. Shows there's far too much income concentrated at the top. The tax base should be broader.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote