[Chrysalis]

Tweedle I am merely making the point that its more likely those clothes were not paid for in cash than they were.

So yes could have been shoplifted, on credit, gift from friends/family.

We are talking about fraud when the reason for these cuts has already been given, and of course no surprise its not to do with fraud, they admitted PIP been introduced was to cut costs, that was its intended purpose, those cuts would be achieved by making it harder to qualify on mobility grounds, its worth pointing out here that it is extremely hard to qualify for PIP for mobility, the criteria is extremely strict. Its very possible that someone can have very limited mobility but not qualify for PIP on mobility grounds, especually with how mobility aids are treated. The way they intend to achieve these cuts is basically by moving goalposts, so the qualifying criteria, this is because the DWP have been losing too many tribunal cases, which in short means PIP hasnt achieved the cuts it was targeted to make, thats it really, nothing to do with fraud.

Of course fraud was brought into this conversation because it makes the cuts seem more morally sound if we all think legit disabled people are not affected by it.

Tweedle, you are one for dishing it out, its as if you wasnt expected it to come back at you.

This is just the tip of the iceberg as well, there is cuts nationwide for council run services that are aimed to help vulnerable people due to how much this government is squeezing council budgets and tying their hands in tax rises. Obviously I am going to be upset whilst we have a government that is claiming to be broke, yet is dishing out tax cuts to the middle class and spending billions on foreign aid.