Thread: Superhub Just got the SuperHub 3
View Single Post
Old 05-02-2016, 15:37   #219
Sephiroth
Wisdom & truth
 
Sephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 12,929
Sephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny star
Sephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny star
Re: Just got the SuperHub 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99 View Post
The image posted earlier implies HUB3.0 is now std equipment for new customer installs. *If* your CMTS has been upgraded to make it compatible, would a HUB3.0 (in modem mode) improve the peak-time speeds on an over utilised segment? If so, any idea on by how much?
I take Igni on at my peril - so I won't, this time.

You presumably mean that the CMTS has been upgraded to support 16 or more downstream channels and 8 or more upstream channels. You then ask how much increase in speed would you see in an over utilised segment.

Igni's answer is correct. To answer that question the way you would have liked needs more assumptions which can't really be provided. This notional "over utilised segment" concept needs to be bounded by the number of connected homes, their concurrency, segment and node details before/after any re-segmentation (if any).

You can say that if, without re-segmentation, they add downstream capacity such that the additional downstream channels are not pinched from an existing set, then at the instant of cut over to the new system, downstream congestion would be halved.

HTH and I await some scathing point of disagreement from Igni.
__________________
Seph.

My advice is at your risk.
Sephiroth is offline   Reply With Quote