View Single Post
Old 29-01-2016, 09:16   #18
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Barrett homes say their not responsible for broadband

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr View Post
I'd agree that in a new build senario then it's a bit more complicated, and (this is a guess on my part) it's probably part of the discussion and agreement between VM and the developer as to who is responsible for what.
We were talking about new builds. For other stuff the demarcation is pretty clear.

---------- Post added at 09:16 ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by vm_tech View Post
On the new build sites I've been on VM and BT pay the builders to lay duct, supplied by VM and BT. So the home builder is carrying out the work on behalf of VM/BT meaning it is VM/BT who own the duct.
Indeed. VM/BT supply the kit, builder deploy according to an agreed plan, VM/BT inspect and any defects are remedied.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote