Thread: Superhub Bufferbloat - is it bad?
View Single Post
Old 28-01-2016, 18:26   #33
MUD_Wizard
Inactive
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 382
MUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to beholdMUD_Wizard is a splendid one to behold
Re: Bufferbloat - is it bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnoopZ View Post
Are we saying the DSLreorts are miss reporting my connection bloat? Are there any alternatives to a bloat test i can do?
Run a comparison between the single-threaded and multi-threaded TBB tests over ethernet.

Single threaded: http://labs.thinkbroadband.com/speed...gaUEKWiwklw392

Multi-threaded: http://labs.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/

My bufferbloat results below for the Hub 3.0.

Single-threaded:



Multi-threaded:



As you can see, a big difference in downstream bufferbloat depending on number of threads/connections utilised, as expected.

You may want/need to run the tests several times, as these flash tests can suffer from spikes in data coming from the network card.
MUD_Wizard is offline   Reply With Quote