Thread: Superhub Bufferbloat - is it bad?
View Single Post
Old 24-01-2016, 15:26   #26
Sephiroth
Wisdom & truth
 
Sephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 12,928
Sephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny star
Sephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny star
Re: Bufferbloat - is it bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
It's measuring how latency changes under load. That is the definition of buffer bloat. How long a ping can spend stuck behind the other traffic, in a buffer, before it gets dropped.
Since it is non-ping traffic that matters, the low priority ping has to wait. What's the big deal here? Of course latency changes under load. Realms of ...
__________________
Seph.

My advice is at your risk.
Sephiroth is offline   Reply With Quote