Thread: Superhub Bufferbloat - is it bad?
View Single Post
Old 24-01-2016, 14:10   #23
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Bufferbloat - is it bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
So it's simply latency re-branded as bufferbloat to scare the hell out of peops.
It's measuring how latency changes under load. That is the definition of buffer bloat. How long a ping can spend stuck behind the other traffic, in a buffer, before it gets dropped.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote