Thread: Superhub Bufferbloat - is it bad?
View Single Post
Old 24-01-2016, 09:04   #17
Sephiroth
Wisdom & truth
 
Sephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 12,928
Sephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny star
Sephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny starSephiroth has a nice shiny star
Re: Bufferbloat - is it bad?

I've never understood the concept of downstream buffer bloat. The data arriving is passed straight to the destination device.

Maybe something to do with e.g. A 200 meg circuit but a 100 meg link to the device - there would be some buffering if the arrival rate is 200 meg but then in TCP, semaphores between destination & source would start/stop data flow. Something like that.
__________________
Seph.

My advice is at your risk.
Sephiroth is offline   Reply With Quote