View Single Post
Old 18-01-2016, 01:54   #14
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,286
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Here we go again - Port Talbot to axe 1,000 steel jobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy View Post
Yes shockingly enough I did actually read the link before posting it. I also read it well enough to notice that the part you've highlighted is for the vehicles not the ships but thanks anyway. As I said the government has their reasons for all I know it could've cost to much to renovate the plant to secure the ships contract if that was even an issue. I don't like them hiding behind the EU though

http://www.northeastlabour.eu/confir...ved-steelworks

---------- Post added at 01:19 ---------- Previous post was at 01:17 ----------



Iirc we had one steel company producing stuff only one other company in the world could match and the government still refused to save it a few years back
The ships need special steel as well.
Quote:
Mr Dunne said: ‘The steel for HMS Forth (as well as HMS Medway and HMS Trent) is sourced via Dent Steel Services (Yorkshire), who conduct shot blasting and priming, from SSAB of Stockholm (previously ‘Swedish Steel’) who are able to supply the grade of steel necessary for this application.’
The amount of steel used still wouldn't be a large enough quantity to keep the steelworks open.

nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote