[Osem]

Originally Posted by Hugh

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35337432 Perhaps I am missing something, but as the Trident submarine fleet is designed to carry ballistic missiles, what is the point of them without the ballistic missiles?

Maybe the point would be that in typical Labour fashion they could then 'save' many of the jobs which would otherwise be lost by abandoning Trident. Since when did Labour worry about creating non-jobs at public expense?
He'll be suggesting the RAF flies planes without bombs/missiles next...



---------- Post added at 16:34 ---------- Previous post was at 16:31 ----------

Originally Posted by denphone

Then they have a lot in common with many of the politicians in the House of Commons then who say one thing and then do exactly the opposite.....

They'd have most in common with those supposed 'men/women of the people' who've got where they are despite being no such thing. Labour's long been infested with them.