Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
|
It's certainly been referred to on their website but the broadcast side (whioch is what Heero and I mentioned) seems to have a different view. Maybe some BBC folks are more reticent than others and they're happier tucking the nasty detail away in the small print.
Given the context of the incident, can anyone think of a valid 'news' reason why it should not have been mentioned on the TV and radio?