View Single Post
Old 29-11-2015, 19:25   #9
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Charger electricity use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
However, I was told yesterday that newer technology means that a lot less power is used/wasted in the same situation these days, so it's not worth bothering any more.

Does anybody know if this is true?
If by newer technology you mean anything made in the last 100 years, then yeah, sure.

---------- Post added at 19:22 ---------- Previous post was at 19:19 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy View Post
Linear transformers (old style) are inefficient (due to the way that the regulator circuit dumps the excess voltage) even when there's no current draw so yes there was loss but not really a great deal unless you're talking about 60-100 amp 12v PSU's that I regularly use (mainly for radio applications due to less interference)
Even then, it draws less energy when there's no load than when there is. So while they're inefficient, it's still untrue that the same power is used when not charging.

Quote:
Switch mode (new style) has actually been around for 40 years and 99.99999999% of PC's ever produced have used one. They are more efficient as they can turn off the circuit when no draw is detected by using an even smaller sub circuit. It's likely that for the last 20 years you've been using this type of PSU to charge your phone, run a laptop so not really newer tech.
Slightly less than 20 years. There were still non-SMPS power supplies in the late 90's/early 2000's. Pretty much all desktop laptop and phones do now use SMPS though, with some reaching over 95% efficiency.

---------- Post added at 19:24 ---------- Previous post was at 19:22 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
This article says that leaving the charger plugged in uses a matter of pennies a year, but that the real waste is people leaving their devices plugged in after the device has fully charged- this wastes enough energy to heat a bath every year.
Having a phone in the first place wastes enough energy to heat a bath every year, so what?

If you unplugged your phone when it was full your battery would be partly drained in the morning so you'd have to charge it more often. The same amount of power goes into the phone either way. It's no more a waste than not turning your phone off overnight. Your phone is going to use power anytime it's on.

---------- Post added at 19:25 ---------- Previous post was at 19:24 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
I don't think its a waste as most devices once up to 100% stop charging so the battery drops a bit then tops up the battery continuously. Trickle charge if you will.

So the energy is getting used.
Some wireless chargers are a bit dodgy in respect, it still delivers full power after the battery is full so it just gets converted into heat on the pads themselves.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote