View Single Post
Old 25-11-2015, 12:07   #44
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Could Virgin lose the right to offer Sky Sports 1 & 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nialli View Post
Well said.
I think Now TV is a masterstroke and the only thing that can hold it back is Sky getting over-protective about its core satellite revenues. If they keep the pricing reasonable, make the right level of back-end investment and take the streaming channels at least to 720p it has the potential to be a considerable player in the years ahead.
I don't think Sky or VM's current way of bundling channels is sustainable long term.

VM once led the market with On Demand , now you could argue they're playing catch up with the rest.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote