View Single Post
Old 23-11-2015, 10:45   #22
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Slow and slower narrow band

Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 View Post
I do hope the OP is willing to come back and eat humble pie once a tech has been out to sort out his power levels.

Ranting on about service when there is a known power level problem does nothing.
What does the scouter say about his power level?

---------- Post added at 11:38 ---------- Previous post was at 11:37 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by horseman View Post
Unfortunately all the web (and client based) speed tests are potentially inconsistent/inaccurate which is why SamKnows developed hardware based test suite that is used by major UK (and other Worldwide) ISP's, OfCom to produce (within 95% confidence) comparative of "end user" averages by Speed Tier(and other performance metrics) and ISP.
You realise the "SamKnows hardware based test suite" is literally a web and client based speed test running on a very slow Linux computer right?

---------- Post added at 11:45 ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
If you're running a bunch of speed tests at the same time this may go some way towards explaining the results of the tests.

As would your use of Which as a baseline.



Pretty good given my connection is ~64Mb/s down and 19Mb/s up.
Man that's terrible.

Oh wait.





It's worse than terrible.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote