Thread: Unstoppable migration?
View Single Post
Old 06-11-2015, 18:32   #882
techguyone
Deus Vult
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: W Mids
Services: VM M350 with Superhub4 (modem mode) > Anytime Chatter > No TV
Posts: 2,081
techguyone has reached the bronze age
techguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze agetechguyone has reached the bronze age
Send a message via Yahoo to techguyone
Re: Unstoppable migration?
I liked this for the hand wringers and fair play lefty types from another forum

Quote:
From an English friend who lives abroad.

Our rulers - Mrs Merkel and Hollande - have demanded that all European countries take their "fair share" of the (mainly Muslim) migrant hordes (swarms?) over-running Europe's apparently unguarded borders.

But how do you decide what a "fair share" is?

Merkel and Hollande will probably try to link the number of migrants to each country's GDP as that will ensure Britain gets landed with most of the flood of human beings pouring into Europe.

But I've got a better idea. Why not link the number of refugees each country takes to its population density?

Not only that, but I've even worked out the numbers for Merkel and her French colleague.

Here's how I've done it. I've started with Europe's most densely populated country - England. England's population density is 413 people per square kilometre (413 ppl/km2).
Then I've worked out how many refugees the main European countries could take for them to reach the same population density as Europe's most densely populated country - England.

To reach the same population density as England (413 ppl/km2), Germany could take 67 million migrants, France could accommodate a whopping 160 million and Spain an even larger 161 million. And our close neighbours in Scotland have room for over 25 million! That should please socialist Sturgeon.

In all, just thirteen European countries could accommodate more than 680 million migrants before reaching the same population density as England.

Well -- that seems to solve the problem of deciding how countries should take their "fair share" of the migrant swarm. So, using my calculations, there's no need forEurope's most densely populated country - England - to take any migrants at all and our friends in these thirteen countries can comfortably absorb over 680 million migrants.

That seems to me to be giving each country the "fair share" that Merkel and Hollande demand!

It's a pity that Cameron (or his wife) has neither the brains to think up such a solution, nor the balls to protect our national interests by standing up to Merkel and Hollande.

England is full! Let the migrant deluge go somewhere else!
Courtesy of arrse (http://www.arrse.co.uk/community/thr...5501/page-1228) it's Armed Forces so don't get all upset because it's not all PC & cosy.
techguyone is offline   Reply With Quote