|
Re: Football Season 2015/2016
Quote:
Fabricio Coloccini will not serve a one-match suspension after his wrongful dismissal claim was successful.
An Independent Regulatory Commission found that the match referee had made an obvious error in dismissing the Newcastle United defender for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity during the game against sunderland on Sunday 25 October 2015.
Newcastle United have been charged for failing to control their players in relation to their reaction to the match referee’s decision.
The club have until 6pm on 30 October 2015 to respond to the charge.
So let's just get this straight, the referee drops an almighty b*ll*ck drastically altering the course of the game and the FA take exception to the Newcastle players for rightfully suggesting that he's wrong.
Surely the extent of Madley's error excuses whatever reaction that follows, due to extreme provocation? One follows the other and the ferocity of our response merely mirrors the stupidity of the original decision?
Newcastle's correct response to the FA should be of no more than four words
|
Couldn't make it up
__________________
All posts are the opinion of myself and don't reflect those of BT or Openreach.
|